Jump to content


Photo

No Lose Correct Score Betting (Slicer Method)


  • Please log in to reply
254 replies to this topic

#31 99reds

99reds

    Moderator

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 339 posts

Posted 21 February 2010 - 10:22 PM

In answer,

Not always (you're still looking for outcomes)

Depends on what the actual odds are

It's hard to say but I played

Aston Villa Vs Burnley today

And I'm playing Real Madrid Vs Villareal now.

Which obviously both won with just bet 1 which wins me 36 per time less commission.

I am making this too easy!


From what you say about winning 36 if Bet 1 wins, I take it that 36 is your 12% ROI profit and you play on games that are around 3.4 to lay 0-0 at HT and around 15.0 to back 0-0 at FT.

#32 kmabet

kmabet

    Heavy Contributor!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 88 posts

Posted 21 February 2010 - 10:32 PM

5

#33 99reds

99reds

    Moderator

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 339 posts

Posted 21 February 2010 - 10:41 PM

I don't know why you would make that supposition REDS?

What I mean by winning 36 is I am giving you a clue as to my staking.

Losing 12% less than you win (Like I do) is not the same as winning 12% ROI.


I misunderstood earlier then. I thought you meant you made a 12% ROI if Bet 1 won and you made 8% ROI if Bet 1 lost.

I realised you were trying to give a clue about staking when you mentioned 36 profit.

If it is 0-0 at HT do you always have to adjust Bet 2?

Have changed the title for you.

#34 kmabet

kmabet

    Heavy Contributor!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 88 posts

Posted 21 February 2010 - 10:53 PM

A quote

"Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."

#35 99reds

99reds

    Moderator

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 339 posts

Posted 21 February 2010 - 11:03 PM

If bet 1 loses, you will always have to adjust bet 2 and place bet 3.


A quote

"Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."


And something to consider...

If your trades are on one market only and
if you win 1000 and lose 950 then your commission is 2.50

If your trades are on two markets and
if you win 1000 on the first market
and lose 950 on the second
then your commission is 50



Your point is well made with regards to trading on two markets and the affect of commission, from which I summise that Bet 2 and 3 are both on the Correct Score market.

#36 kmabet

kmabet

    Heavy Contributor!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 88 posts

Posted 21 February 2010 - 11:08 PM

6

#37 99reds

99reds

    Moderator

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 339 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 01:18 PM

You are about the best at this that I have come across!

Such simple clues if you only have the intellect to unravel them!

Your genius is surpassed only by my own!!! ;)


Is Bet 3 (or part of Bet 3) ever placed before Half Time?

Is Bet 2 the uniformly red market?

#38 lowereast

lowereast

    LTO Newbie!

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 03:22 PM

Kam I'm very intrigued by this that I've gone from lurking to signing up lol, even if I cant crack it, it has given a couple of ideas of trying to use something from it

its the amount of bet 2 adjustment at HT that needs to be found I would be happy just to cover the loss of bet 1 if it is 0-0 at HT

#39 kmabet

kmabet

    Heavy Contributor!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 88 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 05:37 PM

7

#40 kmabet

kmabet

    Heavy Contributor!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 88 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 05:37 PM

7

#41 lowereast

lowereast

    LTO Newbie!

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 05:46 PM

You will not be able to achieve this at HT

do you lay some of the 0-0 off at half time and then maybe back 0-1 and 1-0 although this would also need trading if a goal is scored am I getting warm or like the weather outside freezing cold? :D

#42 kmabet

kmabet

    Heavy Contributor!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 88 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 05:51 PM

7

#43 lowereast

lowereast

    LTO Newbie!

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 05:57 PM

You cannot make enough equity from trading the 0-0 FT to cover your loss from bet 1 and also your prospective loss if the game ends 0-0.

By betting in the structure you have described, you are only making your potential negative equity situation worse.

cheers fella, thats me done for

#44 kmabet

kmabet

    Heavy Contributor!

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 88 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 06:34 PM

8

#45 Steve.C

Steve.C

    Moderator

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 198 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 07:59 PM

Hi Kma

So you lay 1 point at the ht 0-0 odds, and back ft 0-0 @0.60 points using games with a strong home team advantage, if a goal is scored in the 1st half then you make 12% roi......if not you lay back some of your potential winnings on the 0-0 back bet to reduce the lost lay bet and........then place bet 3 which is.....


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Online Payment Processing